Some polluting companies often stage a “cat and mouse†game with environmental law enforcement inspections: the people report corporate emissions, environmental protection checks, and the company’s environmental protection facilities are functioning normally; In most cases, "cats" cannot catch "rats." This time, I got caught.
At 5 pm on the July 30th, Hubei Province cleared and rectified the illegal polluting enterprises and the inspection group raided the first paper mill in Danjiangkou City. The inspection team’s law enforcement personnel showed the badges to the guards, the guards opened the iron gates, and the inspection team went directly to the sewage treatment station inside the factory. The guards quickly grabbed the phone and kept playing. The sewage treatment station was another iron gate. A young law enforcement officer slammed through the door and the workers inside opened the door. I saw the workers in the processing station filling out the records and turning on the machine in a panic. Suddenly, the original stationary machine started... All of this was videotaped by the inventory team.
Law enforcement officers look through the emissions record. In the hastily filled-in record book, some dates were filled in incorrectly, and the COD record was about 450 mg/L every day. This is a basic number of standards. On-duty workers also insisted that the discharge was up to standard.
Law enforcement officers immediately collected two bottles of discharged sewage (after the night monitoring, COD were 1065mg/L and 969mg/L, respectively). Law enforcement officials also found that the flocculants that were piled up in the room to treat sewage were still in the state they had seen during the last inspection and were barely used.
The inspection team asked the laboratory to look at the laboratory records and came to the laboratory but could not find anyone. A deputy director surnamed Wei said that there were no laboratory records.
In the face of the "current" grasped by the inventory group, the factory had to admit that the discharged water was "somewhat problematic," and it said that "it would not be stolen."